Land Confiscation for Flight 93 Memorial

...

Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:36:45 +0100

seizure of that property would be permanently tainting any memorial erected. also, 58 million sure seems excessive for a remembrance. - ehutch

Memorial? Yes! Land grab? No

Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:09:28 +0100

I am all for a memorial to the heroes of Flight 93, but if the families cannot buy the land, they should look for alternatives. - Charles_Byrd

Truth first

Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:24:52 +0100

First lets complete a true investigation of 911. I live in Cleveland and on 911 there was a news report that confirmed that the hijacked plan landed safely at Hopkins Airport and passengers were being let off on the runway. No subsequent news about that. The pictures of the Flight 93 crash site had no wreckage, no luggage, no plane. See You tube. You ask what about the passengers? First we need to see what happened. If the CIA was behind this. It is easy to have 35 paid CIA agents on that plane. Their budget is larger than General Motors. Think how many undercover employees they must have. I am for helping honest victims, after honest investigation. If the CIA had nothing to do with it, we can all have a good laugh and bless our freedom. God Bless JBS. - DaveB

RE: Karl Marx's dictum "Abolition of Private Property as a plank - emininent domain

Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:19:45 +0100

In my book I explained as Dad explained the planks of the socialist/communist Communist Manifesto. Karl Marx's dictum "Abolition of Private Property" is like the eminent domain of today's America. My late father exposed the dangerous fallacies of Norman Thomas Socialism and Karl Marx's Communism and gave the history of the American Communist Party and the American Socialist Party. This book will be published by a reputable conservative publisher like Regnery and it is 100% true and honest as Jack McManus read the manuscript. Peter F. Steele - Peter Steele

Flight 93 Memorial

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:24:26 +0100

Few citizens of the US will dispute the need for a memorial to the passengers and crew who lost their lives on Flight 93. However, is it necessary to spend $58,000,000 on it? And is it necessary to utilize so much land in the process? Once again, it's easy to spend other people's money. That's our government at work. - Bob Heiney

Not all the families are for the land confiscation, or for the crescent memorial itself

Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:42:30 +0100

The Flight 93 families are divided on this. In particular, the Burnett family has supported the Svonavec's against the memorial Project's thuggish behavior. Mr. Burnett has also protested the memorial design. He does not want the Park Service planting a giant Islamic shaped crescent atop his son's grave. Video of Mr. Burnett's plea for help in stopping this atrocity here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4z1QN6m_QI - Alec Rawls

Nope

Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:54:05 +0100

The government has absolutely no right to seize Mr. Svonavec's land, no exceptions. If you deviate even a fraction away from the principles inherent in the Constitution (which is clearly obvious all around us, to those who can see it) you are simply opening the flood gates to further deviation. Now if the two parties can reach some type of agreement then that would be perfectly fine, and I hope that they do. - GaryRLewis