<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Left's Assault on Language</title>
		<description>Comments for The Left's Assault on Language at http://www.jbs.org , comment 1 to 10 out of 10 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.jbs.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:47:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Bush a Freemason?</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4560#comment-798</link>
			<description>No Masonic Lodge worth its Charter would have George Bush as a member! - Douglas Strother</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:28:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A Lexicon of Marxist-Leninist Semantics</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4560#comment-697</link>
			<description>&quot;A Lexicon of Marxist-Leninist Semantics,&quot; ISBN 0-913603-00-7 was published in 1983 by Western Goals, 111 So. Columbus St., Alexandria, VA, 22314. The late Dr. Lawrence P. McDonald, Congressman from Georgia, was in charge of it. Dr. McDonald was shot down on Korea Airlines 007 over Sakhalin Island, probably for knowing too much about the Master Conspiracy and wanting to expose it with his data bank.

His Lexicon is a masterpiece of stabilizing the terminology of the Marxist world movement. It is a valuable reference for those who are following the &quot;Diversiyia&quot; being practiced by World Communism as part of its doctrine. - SCHNORCHEL</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:49:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Amen</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4560#comment-693</link>
			<description>Thank you for that! I've been working on ways to explain to people the REAL political spectrum. &quot;Overview of America&quot; does a good job of it. It seems to me the best way to prove that the mainstream of the 2 parties represent the same views is to introduce people to organisations like the CFR, The Trilateral Commission and the bilderberg group. I've found the most efficient way to have a real impact on people, without having to debate every person I come in contact with, is to copy and distribute Alex Jones' ENDGAME. It costs about 25 cents to copy and seems to have an affect on even people in the deepest of denial. A small price to pay to wake people up. Alex has a new film coming out around march 15 or 16 called &quot;The Obama Deception&quot;. You can bet its going to cover Obamas globalist connection as well as expose his two faced approach to &quot;change&quot;. It might be hard to get the lefties to even look at it at this point, but it may prove a useful tool to wake up conservatives that have been poisoned by the koolaid that Fox News and the rest have been generously serving. I hope others here will take advantage of these useful tools and help spread the seeds of truth and freedom. Keep in mind that in todays world it's a lot easier to get someone to watch a dvd than to read a book, not to mention a lot cheaper. God bless. - www.TruthPatriot.com</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:34:16 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Redefitition of Conservatism</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4560#comment-661</link>
			<description>If we read John Birch Society John McManus' book &quot;William F. Buckley, pied piper of the Establishment&quot; [ISBN 1-881919-06-4], we will find out that Harvard Skull and Bones member  and Council on Foreign Relations member William Buckley led true conservatives into neo-conservatism that we see today.

Buckley also set the stage for younger pied pipers who would lead unwitting conservatives even further away. - SCHNORCHEL</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:31:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Another word twisted by the &quot;liberal&quot; left</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4560#comment-658</link>
			<description>Another word that I'm getting very tired of hearing twisted, deliberately or ignorantly, is immigrant.  I'm so sick and tired of hearing some idiotic jerk of a moron puking up the phrases:  &quot;we're all immigrants&quot; or &quot;we are a nation of immigrants&quot;.  What a bucket of manure!!  Excuse me, my Mom's side of the family have been here since the late 1700s and my Dad's side of the family since the mid 1800s.  I am not an immigrant and I resent some fool trying to tell me that I am.  You know, when it comes right down to it, much of the &quot;liberal&quot; left is nothing more than a pathetic collection of confused fools (some of them with very high IQs and a lots of &quot;higher&quot; education).  Not only that, it seems their two favorite pastimes are lying and stealing. - danwhitehead1</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:38:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Use the Bible</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4560#comment-656</link>
			<description>The leftists I have to confront in my area are radical Alinsky trained communist. I am trying to get nonpolitically correct subjects politically correct in our area. An example of this is a letter that the local newspaper editor will get a chance to publish next month, the Lord willing. The letter goes like this:

   &quot; A couple of nonpolitically correct subjects 
1. What God says about spanking a child
Proverbs 23:13-14 (New Living Translation) “ Don’t fail to discipline your children. They won’t die if you spank them. Physical discipline may well save them from death.”  Love and discipline is not an oxymoron. 
2. The Second Amendment is clear:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
God, for one thing, established governments to punish crime, but what happens if governments are law-breakers also? For instance: Why should states be allowed to require a permit for a person to carry a concealed weapon when the federal Constitution guarantees our right to keep armed? Should federal police arrest state governments for breaking the law of the land? Since we are dealing with state governments should the U.S. Army be called out to protect us from unconstitutional laws? I think so, if need be.
We need to make these two politically correct.&quot;

The editor usually prints my letters. - MarkGlen</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:02:26 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A bullheaded West Texan</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4560#comment-655</link>
			<description>Pres. Bush is a lying-Skull-and-Bones-stubborn-West-Texas-Judas. - MarkGlen</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:52:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Solid commentary but...</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4560#comment-653</link>
			<description>I would add to your notion, as I understand it, that GW Bush was/is a represenative of the &quot;religious left&quot;- if you are referring to his Methodist background and the extremely liberal form of so-called Christianity which the modern Methodist church represents- that Mr. Bush is a greater representative, not of some kind of veiled religious &quot;Dominionism&quot;, as is the oft-given reason of conservatives looking to excuse his treasonous betrayals of our constitution, but of the kind of globalism interned at the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, etc.  

And &quot;the erratic way President Bush conducted himself in office&quot; was an outgrowth of the steady, and deliberate, destruction and defaming of real conservatism which is represented by neo-cons today.  That phony form of conservatism is aimed toward the further aligning and shifting of real conservatives away from constitutionalism and toward the one-party, one-philosophy state now emerging before us.  

I also have issue with this statement: &quot;He did so because he believed the “evangelical” myth that nationalism – and hence, national sovereignty as opposed to allegiance to world or supranational government – is anti-Christian...&quot;  Here again I question, what is the meaning of this?  Surely after eight years of betrayals by the former president/administration you cannot and do not boil down these assaults as the result of some &quot;Christian&quot; bias against nationalism?  The only &quot;evangelical&quot; faith held by President Bush was his absolute desire to see nationalism destroyed and world government exalted.  That evangelical faith is rooted (as I hope you are saying) in Leftism, rightly understood, and had nothing whatsoever to do with biblical Christianity, or Christianity period, except as an easy, and when useful, necessary cover to accomplish the Globalist agenda.   - Lal Wynstrom</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:41:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Newspeak and the Ministry of Truth</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4560#comment-652</link>
			<description>Great Article. My opinion is George Bush is an Atheist disguised as a Christian in order to dupe the Christians into following him into total Fascism. He is probably a FreeMason, who's organization clearly does not believe in Christianity. They have discarded God as an ancient Myth.

We are living &quot;1984&quot; as Mr. Hank appropriately referenced. In 1984, the main character said freedom is the ability to say, 2 plus 2 equals 4. In Fascism/Communism, the Ministry of &quot;Truth&quot;, will rewrite history to make you believe 2 plus 2 equals 5. And so it goes.(911)

God bless JBS. - Dave B</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:52:40 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bravo, Mr. Hank</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4560#comment-650</link>
			<description>Once again, you've hit the nail right on the head, Mr. Hank.  I hope you have more to come.  Most of the nation is wallowing in confusion.  Thank you very much for this clear and concise piece.    - danwhitehead1</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:56:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
