<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>My Trip to a DHS Fusion Center...and How I Lived to Talk About It</title>
		<description>Comments for My Trip to a DHS Fusion Center...and How I Lived to Talk About It at http://www.jbs.org , comment 1 to 8 out of 8 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.jbs.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:14:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Why Saddam was removed from power</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4736#comment-927</link>
			<description>Saddam was removed from power because he defied God. Saddam was determined to rebuild the city of Babylon. God said it wouldn't be rebuilt. Alexander The Great was going to rebuild Babylon, the city. He died suddenly and at a very young age. The following Scripture tells why Saddam Hussein fell.
Isaiah 13:19-20 

 19And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees' excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. 

 20It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make their fold there.


 - MarkGlen</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:32:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>That's How It's Done!</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4736#comment-924</link>
			<description>Thanks Jim! Outreach/ activism is still the key! I believe your experience shows that law enforcement personnel are just like the rest of us for the most part. They can understand our point of view and often times agree with it. If we don't reachout and educate them (and others) we leave the &quot;field of battle&quot; to the SPLC and those of their ilk. - MichaelSmart</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 04:16:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Restore the Constitution</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4736#comment-923</link>
			<description>If the Constitution were returned to it's correct and proper role as a restraint on fedgov power, horrible agencies such as these fusion centers, as well as the associated bureaucracies, would vanish in short order, would they not? - danwhitehead1</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:00:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Great ideas - American initiative will continue to triumph</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4736#comment-921</link>
			<description>Thanks for the informative article, Mr. Capo!

And you have vindicated your comments about befriending law enforcement officers. You have pointed a way to victory over tyranny in a practical, neighborly, on-the-ground way, even as the JBS and others seek legal ways to dismantle its threatening structures.

This article contains many ideas for pro-action in our own communities. Let's make friends, not enemies. There are, after all, more of &quot;us&quot; than of &quot;them.&quot; &quot;The righteous are bold as a lion.&quot; - Pat Henry</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:57:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Empires steal liberty. Republis check tyranny</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4736#comment-920</link>
			<description>First of all America would not be in Iraq if the US senate had voted against the Money Trust's Federal Reserve Act. If Americans had to directly pay for the multi-billion dollar cost of that war, Congress would very likely have voted against sending troops to Iraq and instead could very well have issued those rarely used &quot;Letters Of Marque' to catch the 9-11 plotterswithout sending an entire army out to catch a handful of &quot;evil doers.&quot;

Iraq, never attacked us. Even George Bush said that Saddam had no connection to 9-11, so why are we still in Iraq? 

What have we gotten out of Iraq asks Mr. Badger.

You may have to wait until the final judgement day to ask &quot;W&quot; why he side-stepped Congress with his un-constitutional abuse of undelegated powers to make war on a  country that had no &quot;connection&quot;  to 9-11. Some of us, however, don't have to wait until God's judgement. We figured it out and don't like to hog  good information - we share it with others.

A key component to understanding war is who benefits. You say that we have not seen a single drop of Iraq oil. So maybe you are assuming that our president's motives were not imperialistic but motivated by other non-imperialistic motives. Evidence of Imperialism is oozing out everywhere. The circumstantial evidence goes back to World War I.

Back to the who benefits angle. The Money Trust's central Bank has been making a load of money off Uncle Sam. The US government has to borrow to pay for Iraq. Monetarily speaking, &quot;W's&quot; war didn't cost us a penny up front, but the borrowing to fly now has to be paid later. We have been borrowing to pay for that war. It's called INFLATION!

To get a clear picture of how the rich bankers make a killing with war there are any number of books that explain it, but, fortunately, The New American Magazine has superb writers that give you the whole magillah in succinct fashion:
Creating &quot;Wealth&quot;  and &quot;How The Money Mayhem Began&quot;  in the April 13, 2009 issue  - archtoplee</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:33:26 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4736#comment-919</link>
			<description>  Excellent job, Jim.  I think that a JBS member from each state, preferably a police officer or one in law enforcement. - shurtleffhal</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:56:16 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DHS Fusion Center</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4736#comment-918</link>
			<description>Not that I think it matters what I think, but I disagree with the statement that our war in Iraq is &quot;Imperial&quot;. Would that it were! Unless we want to come up with a new term (neo-imperialism? no, not really) this latest venture is NOT imperial. I say that because America has not extracted anything OUT of Iraq. Imperialists go to other countries, draw borders, then export goods out of countries. What have we gotten out of Irq? Oil? Give me a break, they are joining OPEC. No, Iraq has been used as a zone for American military forces to play the ducks in the terrorist shooting gallery for Iran and Taliban forces to draw fire away from our own country and to give us an area in the mideast that is not hostile to our military moves (in time) since Turkey and the Sauds have balked at giving our military safe haven. If we were IMPERIAL about it, Iraq would be the 51st state and we'd have 15 dollar a barrel oil....This may sound like a small point but I would beg to differ. - Jim Badger</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:15:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Addendum</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/4736#comment-916</link>
			<description>Jim,

I'd also highly recommend that JBS members, in talking with or sending information to local law enforcement personnel include knowledge of the organization Oath Keepers- a conglomeration of former and current military and law enforcement who have taken a series of 10 oaths to uphold the Constitution.  The oaths can be viewed on their website: http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/. Please watch the youtube video on their site. - Lal Wynstrom</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:53:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
