<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Sen. Hatch: Politics Trump Constitution</title>
		<description>Comments for Sen. Hatch: Politics Trump Constitution at http://www.jbs.org , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.jbs.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:46:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5471-sen-hatch-politics-trump-constitution#comment-2495</link>
			<description>Defending the Constitution entails opposing unconstitutional, undeclared wars as well as opposing government healthcare.  Anyone who opposes government healthcare on Constitutional grounds should be opposed to Presidents who start wars wherever and whenever the arms manufacturers need a few trillion.  Iraq is the same boondoggle that Vietnam was.  Next stop on the war profiteering bandwagon: Afghanistan! War profiteers don't sacrifice a dime while American troops sacrifice their lives. - sovereigndust</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:14:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Latest Freedom Index</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5471-sen-hatch-politics-trump-constitution#comment-2486</link>
			<description>While Mr. Hatch has earned a 71% which looks very good compared to Mr. Reid's 0%, we are back to the game of playing lesser of two evils here. Here the Republicrats got called on their un-American activities and the Demoplicans got into power. Now the Republicrats want to show how much they &quot;love&quot; the Constitution.

All these marvelous senators need to be replaced by Constitutionalist Americans.

Repeal the 17th Amendment (which may never have been properly passed by Congress anyway). - RP</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:23:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Anybody really think?</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5471-sen-hatch-politics-trump-constitution#comment-2440</link>
			<description> Anybody really think the ruling elite give a rats a*@ what the Constitution says? Or the American people either, for that matter. If they felt obligated in anyway by their oathes of office, they wouldn't be able to &quot;fundamentally change America&quot;.

  These people in power today are well on their way of accomplishing their goal, a little thing like words on paper aren't going to stop them in creating utopia like their brethern did in Europe. 

  Until the idiots that re-elect these punks, perverts &amp; thieves start paying attention to facts instead of &quot;government freebies&quot;, we'll continue to have the egotistic, narcissist, traitors &amp; thieves that we have now.

  If we don't make wholesale changes in our government, starting in 2010, we may as well get in line &amp; be fitted for our yokes. It may already be too late, our fate may be sealed.

  If that's the case, I'd suggest everyone to stock some food, water &amp; especially ammo. Because to put it bluntly, defecation is going to impact the oscillating unit. God save us all! Here comes the government &amp; they're here to help us! - sosueme</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:56:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Overdue</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5471-sen-hatch-politics-trump-constitution#comment-2438</link>
			<description>Like Senator Harry Reid, Senator Orrin Hatch is way overdue to be replaced with an Americanist.

His hypocritical remarks on the Constitution makes him unqualified to be a Senator. - SCHNORCHEL</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:04:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mr. Creech</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5471-sen-hatch-politics-trump-constitution#comment-2434</link>
			<description>Is 100% correct!!  Thank you Mr. Creech.  If a law passed is in violation of the Constitution, can it not then be said to have the &quot;color&quot; of law and not be a legitimate law and as such can, and should, be defied?  We need lots and lots of laws struck down and removed rather than new ones generated.  Isn't it true that dictators and tyrants love to have lots and lots of laws on the books?   - DDW</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:41:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5471-sen-hatch-politics-trump-constitution#comment-2433</link>
			<description>Thank you Ann for a fresh look at the fact that all law should be in accordance with the constitution and particularly article six. It seems to be high that all laws not meeting this requirement be stripped from codified law. YES HIGH TIME!!  - Kenneth Creech</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:19:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
