Thank you for submitting your chapter report

CEO - October 2010 - The Ground Zero Mosque Controversy

The Ground Zero Mosque Controversy:

Don’t Allow the Left to Own It

by Arthur R. Thompson, CEO

The controversy about an Islamic center and mosque planned for two blocks away from the 9/11 terrorist attack’s Ground Zero in New York is causing concern among many Americans, and rightly so. But what is really going on seems to elude even well-informed people.

A recent front-page article in a Sunday edition of the New York Times contained this paragraph:

While a high-profile battle rages over a mosque near ground zero in Manhattan, heated confrontations have also broken out in communities across the country where mosques are proposed for far less hallowed locations.

My reason for completing a recent speaking tour, writing a booklet, and producing the DVD entitled Exposing Terrorism was to demonstrate that Muslim terrorism was not Muslim at the top but Russian-sponsored in collusion with American Insiders.

Opponents of the Islamic center at Ground Zero not only don’t understand what I have been trying to convey, they fail completely to consider the larger picture involved. And those involved in the various confrontations across our country don’t either.

Four decades ago, The John Birch Society produced a film entitled Anarchy USA. It brilliantly documented the use of the divide-and-conquer strategy that was employed in Algeria, China, and Cuba to help communize these countries. And it further showed how the same strategy was being used to communize the United States.

Anarchy is the equivalent of a vacuum where law and order has broken down and, just as nature abhors a vacuum, something rushes in to fill it. In the case of a country, more government rushes in. Therefore, anarchy is a tool used by those who want more government, even total government.

Let me list the main steps leading to anarchy and then show how today’s events are following this pattern. While some of these steps overlap, they are:

  1. Divide the people.
  2. Create the appearance of popular support.
  3. Neutralize the opposition.
  4. Precipitate mob violence.
  5. Create the semblance of revolution.

Keep in mind as we look at this time-worn technique that the majority of the victims in this scenario will be average Americans who are innocent people on both sides. Without understanding what is transpiring, they will serve as cannon fodder in an operation designed to destroy freedom in the United States.

Insiders will control the agitation with a few of their well-placed agents. The vast bulk of those who allow themselves to be led by these conspiracy operatives will be just as much the victims of what is going on as anyone. In some cases, more so, since they are usually the ones who suffer most in the long run, as I will show further on.

Divide the People.

It is hard to imagine a more divisive idea than for Muslims to build an Islamic center and mosque right next to 9/11’s Ground Zero. Such a plan divides the people. Make no mistake about it, the plan has to be deliberate.

Those who will finance and build this site and those in the local government who approve it had to know what the reaction of the average citizen would be. That being the case, they had to have wanted to divide the people. After all, they could have planned to build it elsewhere in the city, if indeed it was really needed. Why so close to ground zero? It makes no sense unless they want to create a division.

While it is not empirical evidence of the desire to create a rift, it has to at least raise some eyebrows when the city of New York has not approved the longstanding petition of an Orthodox church not far from this same site for a renovation project; and, when the Imam in charge of the mosque project is invited to speak to the Council on Foreign Relations.

We know that the planners for this edifice had the legal right to proceed as planned. But having legal right and refusing to take into consideration the sensibilities of so many, especially the families of close to 3,000 victims, adds a whole new dimension to the matter. The Muslims could go elsewhere and it certainly seems that they should.

The evidence of the division being generated is nationwide, as reported by YouTube, the evening news, and your newspaper and magazines. The aforementioned New York Times article highlighted the growing manifestation of this division. And, topping it off, organizations are helping ramp up the agitation with fundraising letters to “combat the problem.”

Part of dividing the people requires having agents on both sides whipping up the people against each other. Make no mistake about it, sound arguments can be used to inflame people just as well, and maybe even more capably, than false claims. But inflame is the key word. All of the videos and articles protesting the building of the Muslim center miss a main point, which is that this is a deliberate attempt to divide the people and steer individuals on both sides into violence.

The same situation exists regarding immigration. Note that I did not say “illegal immigration.” All forms of immigration into our country have reached numbers that are dividing the people, actually balkanizing them.  Even the mosque issue results from both legal and illegal immigration.

We tend to concentrate on illegal immigration, but a huge wave of legal immigration is another problem because it, too, spawns divisiveness within America.

We should ask ourselves where are all these people coming from? They are not only coming over the southern border. They do enter the United States over the northern border and coastal ports as well. They are not coming from the Latin countries exclusively. They are coming from Eastern Europe, Asia, the Indian Subcontinent, and the Middle East. Many are being flown in by our government and given subsidies when they get here.

We are experiencing a flood of gigantic proportions that is seriously impacting our national culture. One prime result is the tearing apart of the Judeo-Christian underpinnings of our Constitution. Expecting all of these new entrants to assimilate rapidly into the American way of life is expecting the impossible. As for understanding the American system of government, that too is an unreal hope, particularly under the current condition of American education.

It is quite likely that the battle for strict adherence to the Constitution would have already been won by 2000 if it had not been for the vast number of immigrants entering our country since 1970.

We are not opposed to people entering the U.S.A. But we are opposed to millions coming here illegally, and also to an inordinate amount coming legally because of the harm that will befall our system of government. Those who are running our government are not making a mistake; they know what they are doing. Massive, sudden immigration has been encouraged and used as a tool by a conspiracy determined to destroy the Constitution ever since the founding of this country.

The greatest roadblock in the conspiracy’s plans is a well-informed American population. Conspirators will use any means whatsoever to dilute the effect of the well-informed. This goal is being achieved by permitting the entry of millions of uninformed illegal immigrants from south of the border, but it also includes the huge influx of legal immigrants entering from elsewhere.

Despite all of their efforts, the Insiders have not been able to create the amount of division among the American people to serve their purposes ever since their attempt to do so during and after the Civil War. They used that war to change a great deal about our system of government, but there were enough leaders then who pulled the nation away from the overt totalitarianism sought by wartime radicals.

Later, conspirators tried to divide the nation for their sinister purposes with the 1960s–1970s civil rights movement.  But this plan didn’t work in large part because of widespread efforts of members of The John Birch Society including their showing of the film Anarchy USA.

The attempts to radicalize the black population into creating revolution during the civil rights days didn’t work because most of America’s black citizens were patriotic and had a strong religious base. It is true that communist organizations grew and remain in place in some black communities, but their effect is nowhere near what the Insiders needed for their hate-inspiring agenda to succeed. 

Insider agents within our own government have had to import those they could use to divide America. The massive immigration we have endured is key to their overall plan. 

There are other divisive means that the Insiders are using with various degrees of success. In religion, it’s not just Christian vs. Moslem, but Christian vs. Christian, or even Christian vs. Jew.  It’s women’s “liberation” vs. the traditional role of women — which seems on hold.  And it’s young vs. old, haves vs. have-nots, even Republicans vs. Democrats.

Create the Appearance of Popular Support

The Insiders have used their allies in the controlled media and in a variety of street organizations to create the appearance of popular support for their favored groups. This is done in two ways: 1) constantly portraying in a positive light the side they control, while portraying the other side as extreme, xenophobic, racist, etc.; and 2) failing to report the existence of any opposition to their favored groups, downplaying and even ignoring any support for opposition by deflating and disparaging the numbers they attract at opposition events.

The latter tactic becomes obvious when mere close-up shots of small groups on the periphery are provided rather than a wide-angle shot of the entire throng. Also, if anyone in the opposition group has an extreme appearance, all the better since the mainstream media will focus on that person to project the image of extremism.

This is the manner in which the media has treated The John Birch Society over the past several decades. Fifty leftists and dupes gathered at a meeting make the evening news. Hundreds of Birchers and friends do not.

Regarding the planned Islamic center, large demonstrations protesting it have been held in New York. But outside New York, one would be hard-pressed to know the size of these protests unless one is a regular visitor to YouTube and the Internet.

These media techniques have been employed during reports about both the planned mosque and the immigration problem. Regarding immigration, the opposition is so large that the mass media haven’t been able to ignore it and have had to be masterful in their presentation. They attempt to make it look as though they are presenting a balanced view when in reality they are keeping Americans gazing at the tube while the socialists in government are moving forward with their agenda.

The overall idea is to have enough Americans doing nothing.

Today, one of the main obstacles thwarting this second aspect of their overall “create the appearance of popular support” tactic has been the use of the Internet. This is only one of the reasons that the Insiders want control over the Internet and are trying to establish it through the Obama administration, and its friends in Russia and China.

The Internet serves as a resource for networking as well as for communicating; the “word” can get out, and can serve as a means to organize. This is dangerous to totalitarians who know they must shut down access to the truth and keep their opposition in the dark.

When considering the need for popular support, the Internet can create it for either side or both, depending on whatever is needed at a given time. It can show great support and supply praise for one side, or it can show minimal support and condemnation for anther. The Insiders need to show the appearance only of support, or of majority support, for their “side.” They will do anything necessary to stop any appearance of support for their opposition. Nevertheless, the Internet remains a problem for them — but they are working on it.

Neutralize the Opposition

This can be done through a number of different ways depending on the power of the Insiders in any country. One of the most effective means to neutralize opponents is smearing them by using allies in the media and street organizations. Insider agents usually try to bar opponents from the media, not even identifying them unless they have to. If they feel they have to acknowledge the existence of opponents, they will do so while casting aspersions at their reputations. Such charges as racist, anti-Semite, extremist, conspiracy theorist, etc. are customarily tossed around.

This type attack was intensely used against The John Birch Society in the 1960s. But it didn’t succeed in destroying our organization as it had in the past with other groups and individuals. One reason it failed was that the Society’s organizational structure prevented such a result. There is no question, however, that the attack did slow down and marginalize some of our work. But at the same time, it gave publicity to the Society and helped rally many real patriots to our side. In the end, the attacks were called off because they had obviously become counterproductive.

Newly organized citizens who have awakened to the problems besetting our country and are trying to do something about them have likewise run into this buzz saw of smear and innuendo. And, at every opportunity the media have tried to make them appear to be linked to the JBS after resurrecting old invectives against us in the articles. While we do have a great amount of influence in these groups through our members, we do not control or set their agenda in any way from our headquarters.

Precipitate Mob Violence

Agents of the Insiders in government need excuses to clamp down on the people. Violence in the streets is one way to fill that need. The use of terrorism is another. Either serves them well as an excuse to impose police state controls.

The more violence, the more the people will cry for “law and order” and “security,” never understanding that they are victims of a pincer movement: pressure from below in the streets and pressure from above in the government and the media. Both are orchestrated by the same forces seeking the imposition of police state controls.

When it comes to the “Muslim problem,” some Americans already advocate the removal of Muslims from our nation in the name of the War on Terror. The planned mosque near Ground Zero only exacerbates the problem and leads more Americans to want “action.”

More and more, a sentiment already spreading in America is only one step away from such “action.” Getting people into street demonstrations is the beginning. Then agents provocateurs can start to agitate the crowd and before you know it, violence ensues.

This happened repeatedly during the civil rights movement and it led to our producing Anarchy USA as an effective tool to create understanding and quell the violence.

We have even seen reports of demonstrations against mosques by opponents who employ dogs because Muslims look at dogs as ritually unclean. You can imagine what could happen if this scenario is played out.

In America today, there exists potential for at least two full-scale problems in the streets: Christian/Jews vs. Muslims, and the Aztlan movement vs. traditional Americans. In both cases, not much will be needed for the more volatile individuals in these groups to engage in violence. Should this occur, there will be more police and more laws.  If it continues, we can expect soldiers in the streets, curfews, curtailment of freedom of assembly, etc.

We are already witnessing counter demonstrations by leftists attempting to cause problems at patriotic rallies. They shout down speakers, create noisy diversions, desecrate the American flag, even engage in toe-to-toe confrontations. These activities are designed to do two things: Precipitate mob violence and create fear in the minds of ordinary patriots so they will stay home, become neutralized, and decline to become involved in any future patriotic activity.

Wherever violence might break out, the evening news will attempt to blame it on the patriots.  No one should forget that the TV cameras don’t start recording until something gets started.  We can count on Leftists starting the violence and knowing that the patriots, or the police, will react. The reaction is what is customarily caught by the cameras and that is what is seen on television, not the initiators of the ruckus.

Create the Semblance of Revolution

The semblance of revolution doesn’t develop unless there are highly placed agents in the government to help bring it on.

Because revolution is an integral part of the plan, the use of that term to describe the goal of a movement is not always the best way to proceed, no matter how obvious is the intent.

Actually, the semblance of revolution is already in the air. It can be witnessed among certain Latino organizations and their open defiance of and disrespect for all things American.

It is becoming more the norm than not to have demonstrations and events that include desecration of the American flag, screaming about capitalism being the fundamental enemy, and calling for open revolution. This type activity has been stirred up by actual communist agents using anti-illegal immigration as an anvil. These scenes are not being broadcast in the media but are available through the Internet — another reason why the Insiders want the Internet controlled.

“Blood is thicker than water” is a well-known saying. Usually we apply it when referring to family ties. It can also be applied when race is the consideration. The communists have always been able to use race as a weapon against the very people they supposedly support, turning them into the cannon fodder necessary for revolution.

We have seen this technique used in country after country where those they whip up usually become the victims. Highly placed communists, such as Manning Johnson, a black American who actually served in the Soviet Politburo and then left the communist movement, told all who would listen what was planned. He spent years exposing such tactics and the certain plan to use black people as cannon fodder.

During the height of the civil rights movement, many black Americans were recruited into a variety of communist cadres and told they were fighting for civil rights. The injustice of some local governments provided the rationale for something far more dangerous, and some fell for it.

But in reality, who were those who suffered the most for the actions of such organizations? The black Americans themselves suffered, and that situation hasn’t changed much over the years.

The riots, burning, and destruction took place in the black communities. Black homes and businesses serving black communities were burned out. Black “leaders” were forced on the communities and some of them, such as big-government promoters Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, remain as exalted black spokesmen today. Who elevated these people to speak for black Americans? Not the black citizens. It was the media, helped along by communist agents and politicians who want only socialists to be leading black Americans, and all Americans.

Prior to the civil rights movement, many inequities certainly did exist. But in the name of a movement they were told would help them, black communities suffered in several ways. After the movement’s heyday, morality took a severe hit as divorce, out of wedlock births, and crime soared. The very people the movement claimed it would help saw their family structure decimated. This was a huge crime perpetrated on the black community by false leaders who claimed to be solving problems.

Responsible black leaders, and there were many, received little or no publicity or recognition by the media. Their influence rarely went beyond their immediate followers, and their numbers continued to dwindle. In addition, the communist cadres often intimidated them to the point where they lived in fear. The average black citizen wasn’t presented any other leadership but the socialist leadership.

Even today, socialists like John Lewis of Georgia, Maxine Waters of California, Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, and Charles Rangel of New York have been the so-called leaders promoted by the media and the Left. The problem is that each of these members of Congress gives the appearance of helping their communities when in reality they are moving them more and more into a socialist swamp, all while helping themselves, of course.

Political pied pipers replace one type of slavery with another, a more universal type of servitude that engulfs all. When people are compelled to work for others, or pay for others’ necessities, they are being made slaves. When all are compelled to work in and for the state, the nation has arrived at the ultimate form of slavery, the condition known as communism.

As the movie Anarchy USA documented so well, increasing the size and power of government was the aim of the civil rights leaders who were presented to the nation as praiseworthy icons of freedom then, and even today. Even some “conservatives” accept this falsehood.

Today, we see the same process is unfolding in the Latino communities. If those who lead the Aztlan movement have their way, the Latinos will end up suffering the most.
Thankfully, within the black communities, responsible leaders are gaining a strong foothold. Christian pastors such as Jesse Lee Peterson, Stevie Craft, James David Manning, Stephen Broden, and a host of others deserve great credit and our thanks.

Another problem not well recognized in the black communities and elsewhere is that the influx of Latino laborers has lowered entry-level wages for legal citizens. This has impacted young black Americans more than anyone. Latino gangs are also a problem in the black communities, especially in Los Angeles.

While many gains have been made, America’s black citizens remain the targets of Insider attention and they continue to suffer real consequences. The Insiders have scant regard for blacks and really do intend to make them the cannon fodder in a revolution.

Are Radical Muslims Backed by Russia?

As shown in our DVD and booklet (both entitled Exposing Terrorism), radical Muslim groups and individuals are performing exactly as radical blacks and Latinos have been acting as they seek to steer Americans into revolutionary activity.

If Muslims are part of our nation’s problems, especially when considering terrorism, why does it seem almost a prerequisite for being hired at an airport that one must be a Muslim? My travels around the country continue to demonstrate to me that the hiring process at major airports leads to an inordinate percentage of Muslims on the job. Obviously, most of these persons have no terrorist plans in mind. But might some? Especially those who are devout and obedient followers of their leaders?

The aim of the Insiders and their many self-serving agents is worldwide revolution followed by world government. The struggle they seek to create between Christians/Jews vs. Muslims gives them the best hope for widening conflict into a truly worldwide revolution.

The Soviet aim of using the Black communities in the 1960s and 1970s to divide America was missing this basic element, since the tactic was in essence confined to the United States, lacking a global dimension. Using Christian vs. Muslim agitation brings a world-wide scope to communist and Insider plans.

Create the Semblance of Revolution

The semblance of revolution doesn’t develop unless there are highly placed agents in the government to bring it on.

Because revolution is an integral part of the plan, the use of that term to describe the goal of a movement is not always the best way to proceed, no matter how obvious is the intent.

Actually, the semblance of revolution is already in the air. It can be witnessed among certain Latino organizations and their open defiance of and disrespect for all things American.

It is becoming more the norm than not to have demonstrations and events that include denigration of the American flag, screaming about capitalism being the fundamental enemy, and calling for open revolution. This type activity has been stirred up by actual communist agents using anti-illegal immigration as an anvil. These scenes are not being broadcast in the media but are available through the Internet ― another reason why the Insiders want the Internet controlled.

“Blood is thicker than water” is a well-known saying. Usually we apply it when referring to family ties. It can also be applied when race is the consideration. The communists have always been able to use race as a weapon against the very people they supposedly support, turning them into the cannon fodder necessary for revolution.

We have seen this technique used in country after country where those they whip up usually become the victims. Highly placed communists, such as Manning Johnson, a black American who actually served in the Soviet Politburo and then left the communist movement, told all who would listen what was planned. He spent years exposing such tactics and the certain plan to use black people as cannon fodder.

During the height of the civil rights movement, many black Americans were recruited into a variety of communist cadres and told they were fighting for civil rights. The injustice of some local governments provided the rationale for something far more dangerous, and some fell for it.

But in reality, who were those who suffered the most for the actions of such organizations? The black Americans themselves suffered, and that situation hasn’t changed much over the years.

The riots, burning, and destruction took place in the black communities. Black homes and businesses serving black communities were burned out. Black “leaders” were forced on the communities and some of them, such as big-government promoters Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, remain as exalted black spokesmen today. Who elevated these people to speak for black Americans? Not the black citizens. It was the media, helped along by communist agents and politicians who want only socialists to be leading black Americans, and all Americans.

Prior to the civil rights movement, many inequities certainly did exist. But in the name of a movement they were told would help them, black communities suffered in several ways. After the movement’s heyday, morality took a severe hit as divorce, out of wedlock births, and crime soared. The very people the movement claimed it would help saw their family structure decimated. This was a huge crime perpetrated on the black community by false leaders who claimed to be solving problems. 

Responsible black leaders, and there were many, received little or no publicity or recognition by the media. Their influence rarely went beyond their immediate followers, and their numbers continued to dwindle. In addition, the communist cadres often intimidated them to the point where they lived in fear. The average black citizen wasn’t presented any other leadership but the socialist leadership.

Even today, socialists like John Lewis of Georgia, Maxine Waters of California, Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, and Charles Rangel of New York have been the so-called leaders promoted by the media and the Left. The problem is that each of these members of Congress gives the appearance of helping their communities when in reality they are moving them more and more into a socialist swamp, all while helping themselves, of course.

Political pied pipers replace one type of slavery with another, a more universal type of servitude that engulfs all. When people are compelled to work for others, or pay for others’ necessities, they are being made slaves. When all are compelled to work in and for the state, the nation has arrived at the ultimate form of slavery, the condition known as communism.

As the movie Anarchy USA documented so well, increasing the size and power of government was the aim of the civil rights leaders who were presented to the nation as praiseworthy icons of freedom then, and even today. Even some “conservatives” accept this falsehood.

Today, we see the same process is unfolding in the Latino communities. If those who lead the Aztlan movement have their way, the Latinos will end up suffering the most.

Thankfully, within the black communities, responsible leaders are gaining a strong foothold. Christian pastors such as Jesse Lee Peterson, Stevie Craft, James David Manning, Stephen Broden, and a host of others deserve great credit and our thanks. 

Another problem not well recognized in the black communities and elsewhere is that the influx of Latino laborers has lowered entry-level wages for legal citizens. This has impacted young black Americans more than anyone. Latino gangs are also a problem in the black communities, especially in Los Angeles.

While many gains have been made, America’s black citizens remain the targets of Insider attention and they continue to suffer real consequences. The Insiders have scant regard for blacks and really do intend to make them the cannon fodder in a revolution.

Are Radical Muslims Backed by Russia?

As shown in our DVD and booklet (both entitled Exposing Terrorism), radical Muslim groups and individuals are performing exactly as radical blacks and Latinos have been acting as they seek to steer Americans into revolutionary activity.  

If Muslims are part of our nation’s problems, especially when considering terrorism, why does it seem almost a prerequisite for being hired at an airport that one must be a Muslim? My travels around the country continue to demonstrate to me that the hiring process at major airports leads to an inordinate percentage of Muslims on the job. Obviously, most of these persons have no terrorist plans in mind. But might some? Especially those who are devout and obedient followers of their leaders?

The aim of the Insiders and their many self-serving agents is worldwide revolution followed by world government. The struggle they seek to create between Christians/Jews vs. Muslims gives them the best hope for widening conflict into a truly worldwide revolution.

The Russian Factor

While the involvement of Russia in American politics today may seem remote, history will one day reveal that Russia is playing a much larger role in what goes on in our nation than even the most astute person realizes. No one should forget that all terrorism is state-sponsored. As we have stated on numerous occasions, Russian leaders, most of whom are former veterans of the dreaded KGB, are sponsoring much of the world’s terror campaigns.

But didn’t the Obama administration recently deport a sizeable number of Russian spies? Yes, this did happen. But we believe the reason the Obama government sped these people out of the country so quickly was that they didn’t want the American people to find out just how large the problem really is. There are well over 1.5 million Russians who have come to America since the so-called collapse of communism. You have to ask the question: Why, after spending millions of dollars and assigning a large number of personnel on a continuous multi-year investigation, did the government suddenly arrest and deport them and immediately insist that they were unimportant? The amount of time and money that went into the investigation would seem to contradict this statement.

The Facebook account of the girlfriend of one of those Russian spies even posted his picture long before he was arrested showing him in a T-shirt depicting the hammer and sickle and the letters CCCP, the Cyrillic alphabet’s initials for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The Facebook message even contained the caption, “a Russian spy”! Was he not someone worthy of intense scrutiny?

Also, a Russian mafioso such as Alisher Usmanov, through Yuri Milner and the company DST, is moving into the social network field, purchasing stock and in other ways helping companies such as Facebook. The inclusion of Chinese and Russian government-sponsored companies is rapidly becoming a major part of the entire U.S. computer industry.

We advise all to be careful about what personal or private information you put on the Internet for all to see. The Russian government is empowering ex-KGB and Russian mob figures to worm their way into certain strategic industries and companies. The danger posed by open attempts coming from the Obama administration and others to take over the Web and other means of communication is real.

The visit of Russian president Dmitry Medvedev to California’s Silicon Valley and the many sweetheart deals with computer and defense industry he garnered illustrate the fact that the treaty signed by Bush and Putin in 2005 calling for the economic integration of the two countries is going forward. My experience in the defense industry some years ago taught me that major defense contractors had no problem selling products to communists even while our fighting men were being killed in Vietnam.

Agitation of the general public by radical Muslim groups has not yet reached the level started by radical Latino groups. There are examples, however, on YouTube where radical Muslims advocate socialism and the stifling of free speech in the U.S.A. The Muslim communities tend to be more introspective and private so it is difficult for the average citizen to witness what is going on in their mosques and other gathering places. This leads to doubts and rumors regardless of what is happening.

This agitation will become a problem with any burning of the Koran and other activities in the U.S.A being played out on YouTube across the Muslim world. And it can only lead to more recruiting into radical Islam and terrorist organizations. This can only widen the problems we face in the Middle East and here at home.

America’s middle class has always been the target. Karl Marx used the word bourgeois. My dictionary says the word means member of the middle class.

The middle class cuts across all religions and races. No religion or race is their “enemy.” But the agents of the conspiracy will use all religions and races as wedges to divide us and make it appear as though we are at war with a religion or a race rather than with them. We all have our differences and as long as we have them in a non-coercive atmosphere, we can live with them.

For those of us who understand what is going on, we cannot allow such initiatives by the Insiders to cloud our judgment or actions. Our job, as it was in the 1960s, is to spread understanding to prevent violence and associated divisive tactics from destroying our country.

At the same time, we must work to force our government to adhere to the Constitution and enforce sane immigration laws. Sane immigration policies would take care of many of these problems.

Let us not forget that while the agents of the conspiracy are at work in trying to implement the five enumerated steps leading to anarchy and revolutionary change, they are also at work in our government to eliminate all vestiges of our Judeo-Christian culture. Only by advocating true liberty, which includes basic morality, can we combat all of these problems.

JBS Facebook JBS Twitter JBS YouTube JBS RSS Feed