Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo is sympathetic to the plight of Mexican police officers, prosecutors and judges who flee to the U.S. when they become targets of increasingly powerful drug cartels.
But he sees a problem in welcoming them to our country because our nation’s asylum laws address the plight only of individuals facing “political persecution by their own governments.”
The police officers and others asking for legal entry into the United States aren’t targets of political persecution. They are being sought out by organized crime bosses who don’t want any interference with their drug trafficking and other crimes. Unlike the many illegal immigrants who continue to sneak across the border, these individuals – already twice as many in 2008 than in the comparable period in 2007 – are openly walking across the border seeking protection.
Some Mexican police officials have already been gunned down. Many more are threatened. “But,” Tancredo asks, “what happens to Mexico if all the good cops flee to the U.S. or Europe, and the only ones left are working hand-in-glove with the criminals?” He poses the same question about the possibility that honest judges, prosecutors, journalists and businessmen will flee.
“The unpleasant truth,” notes the Colorado lawmaker, “is that Mexico exhibits mounting signs of a failed state.” The problem in our southern neighbor isn’t a poor economy, he insists, it’s the “Mexican political system.” He fears that unless the crime problem is solved, those who flee will be “middle class doctors, lawyers, accountants, business owners, teachers and law enforcement officials.” Mexico will then pose an even greater problem, both for our country and the Mexican nation itself.
In a related development not noted by Tancredo, highly successful golf professional Lorena Ochoa recently expressed concern that her winnings in the U.S. have made her and her family a target of kidnappers. A resident of Mexico City, she has publicly expressed fear that the criminals who engage in abduction of the well-to-do for ransom will target her or her loved ones.
Tancredo concludes that our country “must not become an automatic escape valve for honest officials threatened” by violence. Mexico’s problem with rising crime must be solved by Mexicans. “The fate of Mexico hangs in the balance,” he says.
Just as importantly, Mexico stands as an cautionary example of what can happen in a nation when the rule of law is replaced by corruption, greed, graft and excess.

Mister Wong
Webnews
Power-Oldie
Linkarena
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Jumptags
Upchuckr
Simpy
StumbleUpon
Slashdot
Netscape
Furl
Yahoo
Blogmarks
Diigo
Technorati
Newsvine
Googlize this
Blinklist
Facebook
Wikio
Meneame
Diggita


Did you know that out of all Presidential Candidates Tom Tancredo was the first one to mention NAU LOUDLY?
After my husband had a chance to personally speak to Ron Paul and asked Dr.Paul to press the point about NAU in the debates, radio talk-shows and anywhere (just like Tancredo did!) then we've heard about evil plans for NAU and from Ron Paul as well.
I truly think that Tancredo would have killed "this idea of a North-American Union in its infancy" if Ms. Chief Campaign Manager didn't kill the idea of his campaign before then!
I was disappointed to hear that Tancredo would be spending the next 5 years playing with his grandchildren. And I am happy to see that here and there he is still speaking out LOUD on the issues!!!
And the same is happening to our Nation. Orwell's living large. It's a matter of time before the Mexican Criminals become the Absolute Mexican Government, and then enslave their citizens and start causing massive amounts of crime on the American population, which has already started. So, Marxism/Fascism would come out of the most Capitalist of practices.
As far as it goes, shame on President Polk for giving Mexico back to the Mexicans. We should've kept it as a territory and administered more states down there, and then the Mexican problem would be solved. So, yes, I'm blaming the Democrat Polk in the 1850s for the Mexican problem we have today. That's the source of all of this.
Here is my take on this Mexico problem. I'm with you about Tancredo. I think the man is sincere in his desire to address this problem. I just think there is much more to it than he recognizes or even wants to admit. As for the Mexican professionals trying to head our way, I say document them and let them come. This country can always use good talent. I have no problem with legal immigration if it contributes to America's greatness.
I would rather have a heavily armed (and thus secure) border with a failed Mexico than no border at all with a marginalized one. That may sound crazy, but Mexico is rapidly approaching the tipping point and it would be ashame for this country to miss out on the opportunity to assimulate a new crop of productive citizens.
The question becomes how do we maintain the flow of Mexican oil to the United States should that country completely fold? I believe they are our 3rd largest supplier ... I could be mistaken on that one, but I don't think so.
So: Nail the border shut. Admit the talent. Secure the supply. Where am I wrong?