JBS Action Alert: Update -- Senate Passes Housing Bailout Bill, President to Sign PDF Print E-mail
Written by Wayne Olson   
Thursday, 24 July 2008 07:50

Update, July 26. Today the Senate passed H.R. 3221, the housing bailout bill, by 72 to 13 (Roll Call #186). President Bush will sign quickly.

H.R. 3221, the American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008, was passed by the House 272-152 on Wednesday, July 23, 2008 (Roll Call #519).

  Ron Paul on the Freddie/Fannie Bailout
 

The Senate voted overwhelmingly (80-13) on Friday morning to end debate, with a vote to clear the housing bill expected on Saturday, July 26. Enactment of this legislation would be a victory for socialism and big government, but a travesty for U.S. taxpayers and limited government. This one-time energy bill was transformed into a vehicle for mortgage foreclosure prevention, then very recently revised again to include plans for preventing the failure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, share-holder owned companies that have lost billions of dollars in the last year and whose stock prices plummeted, but then rebounded this week.

Fannie and Freddie are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), created by Congress to serve governmental objectives, such as that of encouraging home ownership. They are two of the world’s largest financial companies, holding two out of every five mortgages. Although Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac operate much like other companies, their close relationship with government is being used as a pretext for exposing taxpayers to part of their $5.2 trillion in outstanding debt and obligations. 

H.R. 3221 would grant the administration authority through 2009 to loan money through the Treasury to Fannie and Freddie, or to buy (prop up) their stock. The plan has no dollar cap on the related spending other than by being subject to the nation’s statutory debt limit. The measure includes raising the national debt limit from $9.8 trillion to $10.6 trillion. As an interim measure until legislation is enacted, the Federal Reserve has given open lines of credit to Fannie and Freddie.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) announced that the bailout plan could cost the government $25 billion over two years. It was also said that a slight chance exists that additional losses could exceed $100 billion. Senator Judd Gregg (NH) called the numbers arbitrary and of little value. Considering that recent budget deficits are approaching half a trillion dollars, Americans desensitized to government spending might not be alarmed. But remember, the two companies have $5.2 trillion in outstanding debt and obligations, and the Bush administration and the Treasury had wanted Congress to provide a virtual blank check with no caps, not even by the statutory debt limit. If a worst case scenario occurs, according to Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), the U.S. $9.5 trillion national debt could explode by 50 percent in an instant.

For additional reasons to oppose this housing bill see:
The Freedom Index, The New American, July 21, 2008 (See House Vote Description #29 and also Senate Vote Description #27.)

Click Here to Take Action to Oppose H.R. 3221.

A Senate vote is imminent, so please call or contact your Senators at once!

Talking Points to Your Senators:

  • Please oppose H.R. 3221, the American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008. Instead rescue taxpayers from big government and hyperinflationary spending.
  • Taxpayers should not be forced to guarantee bad loans made by big banks and lenders, particularly Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Allow the free market to work and cleanse itself of excesses. Let poorly run Fannie and Freddie fail or be broken up and sold. It will teach other banks to be circumspect and not expect a bailout.
  • Taxpayers should not be forced to cover bank and lenders' losses on irresponsible and scandalous housing loans made to buyers who obviously could never afford their payments when extreme, artificially depressed adjustable mortage rates are reset higher.
  • It is unfair for private investors of Fannie and Freddie to reap profits, as in the bubble years, but now expect the taxpayers to absorb their losses, potentially up to $5 trillion.
  • Taxpayers should not be forced to prop up the stock price of any company. Put a stop to outrageous government manipulation of the stock market. It is a blatant repudiation of free markets and a warning sign of totalitarianism and corruption.  
  • Oppose expanding the emergency powers of the Federal Reserve. Reduce them instead.
  • Do not allow this flawed bill to be railroaded through the Senate without allowing its members or the public sector time to scrutinize the latest version and suggest alternatives.

Links For Further Insight:

Rep. Jeb Hensarling: Taxpayers Should Not Pay Billions to Prop Up Trillion Dollar Mortgage Companies

Senator Jim Bunning (KY): Floor Statement in Opposition to the Housing Bill.

Andrew Napolitano: Unconstitutional Bailout

Jim Rogers: Fannie Plan a Disaster (Bloomberg)



Last Updated ( Saturday, 26 July 2008 11:29 )
 
Comments (21)
Does Americans want change.
21 Saturday, 02 August 2008 23:37
William Bailey
I keep hearing the same thing over and over again.They don't listen to the people.If the elected officials will not yield to the people then the Constitution gives us clear instructions on how to fix it.We have the right to life,liberty,and the pursuit of happiness and when any form of government becomes destructive of these ends it is (THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE) (TO ALTAR OR TO ABOLISH IT, AND INSTITUTE NEW GOVERNMENT)If we the people want change then we have to stand United and let our voices be heard.
Foreclosure Prevention Act
20 Tuesday, 29 July 2008 21:59
Melanie Marra
Doesn't everyone see, One more step towards N.O.W.! I'm sick of the scandel! I'm worried for my children! Will congress listen to us? Not my senetor "Rockafeller". Every scandel will benfitthem. Who will call them out and make a differance? It will have to be a grassroots movement!
Bailouts and fingerprints
19 Monday, 28 July 2008 10:12
Skip
Remember, in the video, Ron Paul says people working in mortgage companies have to be fingerprinted; this includes the hoi-polloi who were no part of this horseshit, the honest people who are just trying to earn a living. I have a business degree, guess I can't work in the mortgage industry.
fannie and freddie
18 Sunday, 27 July 2008 19:32
Sam Adams
Don't use my tax dollars for this bullshit, the Bushwackers are already doing what they can,to distroy this Country!
Stop this Wimpification of America
17 Friday, 25 July 2008 20:26
Mickel
The IRS is now harassing citizens like never before because the govt is going broke from ridiculous programs like this. Stop it!
Bill to bail out Fanny May and Fanny Mac
16 Friday, 25 July 2008 20:05
Bruce M Winthrop
I'm tired of the Goverment giving money away that the Tax payers geve to support the goverment
GO BACK TO THE CONSTITUTION.
Stop Bill 3221 it is against the law.
Stop making this country a socialist country
show me where you find bailout in Constitution
15 Friday, 25 July 2008 19:46
Angry in Oregon
I wouldn't complain about bailouts or even foreign aid if my congressman could show me what specific article of the US constitution allows this. But if he can't show me then I recommend that the SOB take the money out of his own wallet to fix things.
Housing surplus
14 Friday, 25 July 2008 15:45
SteveW, Ohio
Markets work. Free markets obey the law of supply and demand: when supply increases faster than demand, value (price) falls. Housing values are falling, maybe we have a housing surplus. Actually, I'm certain that we do.

According to USCB data: In 1960, 180 million Americans lived in 58M homes - 3.1 per home. In 2006, 300M Americans lived in 126M homes - 2.3 per home. If 300M people lived at the 1960 occupancy rate, they would need just 96M homes.

We have a housing surplus equivalent to 30 million homes, a 30% overstock.

WHY?

Let me suggest that this is the result of our 50 year experiment with no-fault divorce, CS enforcement as divorce incentive, and government sponsored family breakup in general. The risky subprime loans were an attempt to provide credit to a population that is increasingly unmarried and financially unstable.

NO "bailout" and no tweaking of lending rules will fix the fundamental problem in the housing market - 30 million surplus homes. There are two strategies that will: either government begins taking title to foreclosed, bailed-out homes and demolishes them for conversion to public facilities, OR we find about 90 million foreigners to immigrate, purchase homes and assimilate into our economy.
HR3221 Freddie/Fannie bailout
13 Friday, 25 July 2008 13:21
Jerome T. Brace
I am against HR3221, as it protects wealthy investors,while not putting a nickle towards helping individual home owners.
This is a mis-use of public funds that come from the pockets of us taxpayers. If there is an immediate benefit to us, the average taxpayer, I would like whoever vote for this bill to let the public know through mass media right away and before a vote and get the public's reaction. Of course, only the truth is what we want, not twisted rhetoric!
HR 3221
12 Friday, 25 July 2008 12:36
Rob Pepe
this is a version of the letter many of us are sending to our Senators today. Copy it, modify it whatever send it or some version thereof:

Regarding: HR3221

This email is to notify you that concerned citizens, of the once sovereign states, are vehemently opposed to the passing of HR3221 that made it through the House on 07/23/08. This bill is nothing less than a corporate welfare scheme, that props up unscrupulous lenders, favors the banking industry, Wall Street alumni, and the private banking cartel that has enslaved all citizens by taxing their labor, The Federal Reserve System. Citizens are becoming increasingly aware of the evils of this banking system and all that support or condone its existence. Furthermore, this legislation HR3221 creates a system whereby the credit card transactions of private individuals would be monitored by the IRS. We have a right to privacy. It is not the Governments’ business how, where, why, when and for what purpose we use our credit cards. Enough already, stop the Communist and Nazi ways of this all powerful, all seeing Federal government! This is a Republic not a Democracy. Eliminate the Fascist Oligarchy that now controls this country. It is time for you to read, restore, uphold and protect the Constitution as you are sworn to do! Advise your colleagues in the Senate to do the same, and to vote in accordance with the wishes of the constituents and oppose this, and any similar legislation! Consequently, we request that you contact your colleagues in the House and urge them to cosponsor, support, and work tirelessly to pass HR2755 abolishing the Federal Reserve System. Thank you.
liars and thieves
11 Friday, 25 July 2008 11:47
Larry P Jarrell
Most congress men and women are liars and thiefs, liers for taking a oath to protect the constition and not doing it.Thiefs for taking money from me and giving to others
Banks Irresponsible - Expecting Bailout
10 Friday, 25 July 2008 09:39
Richard Webb
I am a Realtor buying homes before foreclosure (short sale). Lenders have not cooperated by taking great offers that would prevent foreclosures since this crisis started because they expected a bail-out all along. Spineless economically ignorant politicians shread the constitution, and just inflate the currency, spreading the pain to those who acted responsibly.

Why do they get away with this? Ignorance of the public who expects a muslim messiah to save them with his 143 days of experience in the senate, platitudes, and slick marketing.
bailout
9 Friday, 25 July 2008 07:34
Gary D Whitson
bailing out a loan company with the taxpayers money is wrong. if you're going to throw money away it would better serve the country if you threw it at the people. give US our money back, not a bunch of crooks who made a lot of bad decisions.
H.R.. 3221
8 Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:44
Russ Payne
I am apalled that Congress is attempting the huge bailout
of the criminal government banking scandal. Perhaps, we might expect the creators of such scandal to offer as a remedial concoction from the same laboratory, what they apparently think is an endless supply to tap into, "money for them to steal out of the pocketbooks of our generation and future generations." Perhaps Congress should offer a moral solution, one out of the past and part of the wisdom that built this great nation: aallow free-enterprise to cleanse such excessive corruption.

H.R. 3221 is nothing more than the advocation of more government to solve what govenment caused in the first place. It is a band-aid solution that will only prolong a day of reckoning that will accellerate hyperinflation and complete the destruction of the dollar. This is a criminal action with the force of law behind it. When Congress advoces such laws, their credibility justifies injustice with force.

What this legislation proposes: is bailing out mprivate investors who made a fortune on Fannie Mae and Freeddie Mac in years p[ast, who now have lobbied Congress to cover their loss in this epedemic of defaults resulting from scandalous and irresponsible loans.

Vote no on H.R. 3221!
Prop Up Economy
7 Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:11
starshine
Incing the debt will help assure the economy doesn't weaken too much before the election. If it collapses too much beforehand, many more people could decide to vote against both Obama and McCain by voting third party.
HR 3221 Freddie/Fannie Bailout
6 Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:53
Rick Aiello
This is a Bandaid that will solve nothing. It only puts more fiat money into a debt-based, over-credited-extended economy. You should abolish the Federal Reserve, the entity that is to blame for the collapsing housing bubble!
NO" on the Foreclosure Prevention Act
5 Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:46
Ronald D. Moyers
I demand that you vote NO on the "Foreclosure Prevention Act"! It is not in our U.S. Constitution to bail out the crooked mortgage lenders.
I live on social security and my monthly check is already in jeopardy with $4+ gal gas & rising food prices!!
The loan people should go to jail, not be bailed out!!!!!!!
Put the crooks where they belong and lets start calling them "WHAT THEY ARE"!!!!!!!!!
Thank you,
NO the the foreclosure prevention act
4 Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:44
Matthew Unverferth
why do we need protection from banks on foreclosure when if we are paying our mortgages like we are supposed to then we would not worry about losing our homes. second of all the government needs to back out of the mortgage industry.
Foreclosure Prevention Act
3 Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:23
Catherine Shaffer
When will the bailouts end??? Are country is going broke where is this money coming from?
Like a good partent you have to let them learn not bail them out at every turn. Why should I PAY???

Nobody is bailing me out right now that things ars so bad I can;t pay my bills. DO you want to pay them to????
NO to Foreclosure Prevention Act
2 Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:51
Paddy McAlister
PLEASE say NOOOOOOOO

The bailouts and spending has to STOP !!!
"NO" on the Foreclosure Prevention Act
1 Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:47
Swamp Fox
I demand that you vote NO on the "Foreclosure Prevention Act"! It is not in our U.S. Constitution to bail out the crooked mortgage lenders.
I live on social security and my monthly check is already in jeopardy with $4+ gal gas & rising food prices!!
The loan people should go to jail, not be bailed out!!!!!!!
Put the crooks where they belong and lets start calling them "WHAT THEY ARE"!!!!!!!!!
Thank you,

Add your comment

Your name:
Your email:
Your website:
Subject:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):

Summer Camp

FreedomGen

The New American

TNA CoverExamining Healthcare
Swedish Welfare
Bob Barr Interviewed
The New Democrat
Reviving the Constitution
Much more...

Subscribe Now!

Copyright 2008, The John Birch Society. All rights reserved.