On Wednesday, May 14, the Montana legislature’s Environmental Quality Council and the legislature’s Federal Lands Study Group will hear from a number of Western states that are actively pursuing corrections in federal land management and efforts to bring about the transfer of millions of acres of federally controlled “public lands” to the states.
Montana State Senator Jennifer Fielder, who chairs her state's Federal Lands Study Group, penned an Op-Ed on the Transfer of Public Lands that briefly explains the issues involved and the economic, environmental, and liberty benefits that would accrue to Montanans by assuming control over lands now controlled by federal agencies.
As The New American has reported, Sen. Fielder was one of the organizers of the Legislative Summit on the Transfer for Public Lands held in Salt Lake City on April 18 and attended by more than 50 legislators, county commissioners, and other leaders of the 12 Western states most affected by the federal government’s enormous footprint and economic dominance. (See: Western States Want Feds to Surrender “Federal” Land, Feds vs. the West, and War on the West: Why More Bundy Standoffs Are Coming.)
“It's a big idea and it's rightfully reaping big debate nationwide,” writes Senator Fielder in her op-ed. “Can and should states assume control of federally held public lands within our borders? Many colleagues and experts throughout the west have studied the issue intensively, and we now believe there's no reason why we can't.”
“The challenge is to get the facts on the table, put protections in place consistent with Montana values, and prepare our state agencies for an orderly transition,” she notes. “We also have to educate decision makers and compel Congress to honor the Constitution and the terms of our statehood enabling acts which require federal title to be extinguished.”
According to Sen. Fielder:
The Nevada model for transfer of public lands would leave Wilderness, Indian Reservations, Military installations, National Parks, Wildlife Refuges, and Dept. of Energy facilities under federal jurisdiction. Utah's proposal is similar.
Montana's study of public lands shows Montanans want more multiple use access, reduction of wildfire fuels, and more economic production. But federal agencies systematically continue to do the opposite of what we want.
Click here to read the whole article.