| Scientists Petition on Both Sides of Global Warming Debate | | Print | |
| Written by James Heiser | |||
| Friday, 11 December 2009 13:00 | |||
|
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth. For some reason their skepticism regarding anthropogenic global warming doesn’t get much attention from the media. Go figure. The Met Office has embarked on an urgent exercise to bolster the reputation of climate-change science after the furore over stolen e-mails. More than 1,700 scientists have agreed to sign a statement defending the “professional integrity” of global warming research. They were responding to a round-robin request from the Met Office, which has spent four days collecting signatures. The initiative is a sign of how worried it is that e-mails stolen from the University of East Anglia are fuelling scepticism about man-made global warming at a critical moment in talks on carbon emissions. One scientist said that he felt under pressure to sign the circular or risk losing work. The Met Office admitted that many of the signatories did not work on climate change. John Hirst, the Met Office chief executive, and Julia Slingo, its chief scientist, wrote to 70 colleagues on Sunday asking them to sign “to defend our profession against this unprecedented attack to discredit us and the science of climate change”. They asked them to forward the petition to colleagues to generate support “for a simple statement that we . . . have the utmost confidence in the science base that underpins the evidence for global warming”. But despite protestations of spontaneity, there are apparently some scientists who felt they were pressured to sign. One scientist told The Times he felt under pressure to sign. “The Met Office is a major employer of scientists and has long had a policy of only appointing and working with those who subscribe to their views on man-made global warming,” he said. Professor Slingo denied that the Met Office had put anyone under pressure. “The response has been absolutely spontaneous. As a scientist you sign things you agree with, not because you are worried about what the Met Office might think of you,” she said. Peer pressure is a very powerful thing in almost any area of human activity, and certainly resisting peer pressure in the sciences raises fears — whether justified or not — when it comes time to procure future research grants. It will be interesting to see whether or not other scientists will come forward in the near future claiming that they also felt pressured to sign. However, regardless of the issues of spontaneity and peer pressure, The Times highlights the fact that the signatories represent but a fraction of British scientists. Rt. Rev. James Heiser has served as Pastor of Salem Lutheran Church in Malone, Texas, while maintaining his responsibilities as publisher of Repristination Press, which he established in 1993 to publish academic and popular theological books to serve the Lutheran Church. Heiser has also served since 2005 as the Dean of Missions for The Augustana Ministerium and in 2006 was called to serve as Bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Diocese of North America (ELDoNA). An advocate of manned space exploration, Heiser serves on the Steering Committee of the Mars Society. His publications include two books; The Office of the Ministry in N. Hunnius' Epitome Credendorum (1996) and A Shining City on a Higher Hill: Christianity and the Next New World (2006), as well as dozens of journal articles and book reviews.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (11)
![]()
...
The "theory" of human caused climate change cannot be science without repeatable experimental data. Unfortunately the history of science is replete with examples of "scientists" deciding whether or not a theory is true or false by poll. The prime example is the decision circa 1934 to remove negative energy states from science. The Dirac Wave Equation had four roots--two with positive energy states and two with negative energy states. Without the negative energy state electrons and positrons physics required a host of unobservable sub-atomic particles. See: http://openseti.org/Docs/HotsonPart1.pdf And see: http://www.openseti.org/Docs/HotsonPart2.pdf
Peer pressure
"Peer pressure is a very powerful thing..."
Peer Pressure and Beyond
I agree with rprew's estimation of how "peer pressure" and being coerced by management works. If science is truly scientific, then the law of repetition must be used to establish the ultimate scientific fact. If you do not believe that scientists are being coerced to sign on by peer pressure "or else", I would encourage you to watch Ben Stein's movie "Expelled." In it he interviews a number of scientists who were once considered "golden" by the scientific community, but when these same scientists started using words like "creation" or "intellectual design" they were mocked, ridiculed and eventually pushed out of the scientific community altogether! It appears that the current administration is able to use this same kind of "peer pressure" to coerce, not only science, but the news media, the political process and (I'm afraid) the population as well, to once again believe that a naked Emperor is fully clothed...when in fact, it is true; "The Emperor has no clothes on!"
...
MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING----BAAAAA-HUMBUG!! ITS ALL A SCAM!!! JUST ANOTHER WAY THAT THE RICH GET RICHER OFF OF US!! JUST LIKE THE SWINE-FLU--WHAT HAPPENED TO IT?? GONE WITH THE WIND AS SOON AS THOSE YOU KNOW BETTER TOLD THE ONES WHO DIDNT!! IT WAS A SCAM JUST ANOTHER WAY FOR THEM TO FILL THEIR POCKETS WITH OUR MONEY!!
wake up
This new religion and former science (climatology) is a scam. Most of the believers (climatolojists) will argue that crazy people like me refuse to acknowledge the facts and data on global warming. Well, as to the question of weather or not the Earth is getting warmer, it is.
Global Warming IS Human / Industrial Pollution
Global Warming-IS- Human / Industrial Pollution
SCIENCE and INNOVATION
when will people wake up
When will people wake up.I absolutely believe in climate change just not this man made climate change con. The real problem with this planet is the greedy moneymakers dictating false scenarios for their own benefit not the welfare of the earth.When will the real threats of deforestation, overpopulation,pollution and consumerism of none essential commodities be fully addressed.I always thought it was water vapour that increased earths temperature .Its impossible to predict any climate change.The climate has changed untold times, its nature. Stop trying to think you can change or alter the planet by pathetic c02 manipulation and combat the real issues.Stop being sheep.If you research well enough you will find what a bunch of lying, immoral, self interested "people?" are running countries, who can afford to cut and run and fail to be accountable when things go wrong.It really sickens me how people fall for this clap trap over and over.Just remember people these idiots in charge wont be sitting at home watching their pennies as you continually fund this spiralling con.How many of you will be recompensed when it turns out to be yet another lie. |
Our valuable member James Heiser has been with us since Tuesday, 18 August 2009.
Copyright 2010. The John Birch Society | PO Box 8040, Appleton, Wisconsin 54912 | 920-749-3780 | Standing for Family and Freedom | Terms