Welcome to JBS.org
Login or create your account below.
Login or create your account below.
| 1st Amendment – Who Cares? | | Print | |
| Written by Art Thompson | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Wednesday, 20 January 2010 12:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
What can government do about conspiracy theories? Among the things it can do, what should it do? We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help. Each instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions. However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories which involves a mix of (3), (4) and (5). What many conservatives either do not know or do not remember is that the Clinton administration had a government program that was designed to investigate and neutralize the conservative movement. It was called Project Megiddo. Clinton directed the FBI in 1995 to focus their investigative efforts towards domestic terrorism such as the Christian Right and the Militias. This type of thinking has hampered the ability of the true patriots within our intelligence community from concentrating their efforts on real domestic terrorists and may have already cost this country the full measure of justice in such cases as the Oklahoma City bombing since, as revealed by investigations by William F. Jasper, Senior Editor of The New American magazine, foreign terrorist suspects were likely involved. Art Thompson is CEO of The John Birch Society.
See related articles: Profiling and Criminalizing Political Dissent
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (5)
![]()
rprew
said:
|
|
The ONLY Amendment that seems to matter... ...is a gross misapplication of the 14th Amendment. I think I see an extension of "hate crime" (a.k.a., "thought crime") legislation coming our way. |
|
|
It's been nothing But one outrage after another for a long time now. This current regime ( I refuse to refer to it as an administration) has to be one of the very worst. WAKE UP AMERICA!!! WAKE UP!!! |
|
|
... This guy won't stick with as much attention as we have gathered as a unified nation in the election of Scott Brown (even though he may be temporary). The winds of change are stirring and the storms of war are brewing, be it peaceful or otherwise! Nonetheless, we must continue to win the minds of our friends, family, and neighbors in this neverending fight. Please print out 10 copies of this article and give it to friends. That is all we have to do consistently. God bless |
|
|
... write to you senators and congress SERVANTS to audit the fed, end the CIA, and get rid of this policing of America (with homeland security and FEMA). We need to also end the power of the president's executive orders by returning the power to the state legislature and governors. |
|
|
(3) & (4) already implemented, (6) not mentioned The Kenyan usurper's minion failed to mention (6) murder or confine in FEMA camps citizens who speak out against corruption and totalitarian rule. Since sissified academics like this bum and the parasite class are too cowardly to risk facing resistors shooting at them from behind every blade of grass, they'll send their NWO storm troopers, as witnessed at the G-20 in Pittsburg. You can witness(3) and (4) fully implemented by the corporate media cartel every time you open a newspaper or turn on the TV. |
|