Paul Amendment Would Strike 'Indefinite Detention' Provision From Defense Bill

By:  Ann Shibler
11/29/2011
       
Paul Amendment Would Strike 'Indefinite Detention' Provision From Defense Bill

Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) charged today that Congress did not fix the unconstitutional detainee policy in the final NDAA bill. See update by clicking on this article's headline.

UPDATE, December 17, 2011: Read "Congress Gave the President Sweeping New Power to Detain Americans Indefinitely" to learn about Rep. Justin Amash's (R-Mich.) excellent explanation of how Congress failed to fix the unconstitutional detainee policy in the final version of the National Defense Authorization Act that was passed by the House on December 14 and the Senate on the Senate on December 15.

UPDATE, December 2, 2011: The NDAA bill, S. 1867, was passed by the Senate yesterday. Several amendments regarding detainee detention were voted on. Rand Paul's amendment to simply strike Section 1031 was not voted on; however, a compromise amendment by Senator Feinstein to clarify the meaning of Section 1031 was approved by a vote of 99-1. Rand Paul voted for this compromise amendment. The Senate and House versions of H.R. 1867 will now go to a joint Senate-House conference committee where differences in the two versions will be reconciled. The resulting conference report bill will then go back to both houses for a final vote. President Obama has said all along that he might veto H.R. 1867 over the detainee provisions. So this drama over the detainee provisions of Section 1031 and 1032 is far from over; however, Congress will be working at a fast pace in order to be able to go home for Christmas by December 16.

Deep inside the National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1867) that the Senate is currently considering is a dangerous and unconstitutional portion that needs to be stripped out. Congress would grant the President the power to use the military in order to detain certain individuals, including American citizens, without trial or due process, indefinitely.

Section 1031 of the NDAA reads: “Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force … includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons…. [including] [d]etention under the law of war without trial....” This “indefinite detention” section hands over to the Executive Branch the power to have the military arrest U.S. citizens.  No trial needed.  Simple suspicion would suffice.

This could be quite reminiscent of Stalinist Russia where a knock on the door in the middle of the night meant that the person taken by the military was often never seen again, perhaps having been imprisoned in Siberia or executed. The Japanese American Citizens League has warned that this measure’s detention principles are similar to the ones that sent innocent Japanese-Americans into concentration camps during WW II.

Sadly, this bill has already been passed in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives with nary a whimper by a 322-96 vote.   The excuse given for such an egregious disregard for the Constitution by supporters of the bill including authors Senators John McCain (R- Ariz.)  and Carl Levin (D-Mich.) is that the provision would strengthen and codify the legal framework necessary for dealing with “terrorists.” Other supporters insist that the language doesn’t necessarily include American citizens.

U.S. Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) who voted against the bill in the House, thinks differently. Amash says the act would indeed “permit the federal government to indefinitely detain American citizens on American soil, without charge or trial, at the discretion of the President.” He notes that the language “does not preclude U.S. citizens from being detained indefinitely, without charge or trial, it simply makes such detention discretionary,” therefore it is misleading and outrageous.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is speaking out (see video below) in opposition to the "indefinite detainment" provision of S. 1867. He is also offering an amendment that would simply strike out Section 1031 of the bill. As this article is being written on November 29, the Senate is debating S. 1867 and could vote on the Paul amendment sometime this evening or tomorrow. A related amendment by Senator Udall to revise the detainee provisions of S. 1867 has already been defeated today by a vote of 37 yeas and 61 nays.

Indefinite detention without due process leaves citizens without the legal protection of the Constitution and strikes at the heart of the essence of U.S. law. It is positively shameful that any elected representative would even consider voting for such an assault on so sacred a fundamental value as the right to due process.

Far too much power has already been either usurped or given over to the Executive Branch under the guise of national security. Contact your Senators and demand that they safeguard individual freedom and liberty by upholding the protections guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Have them support the Rand Paul amendment that would completely strike Section 1031 from S. 1867, or any other amendment that would accomplish the same purpose.

If one or more amendments are added to S. 1867, it will likely go to a conference committee and then return to both the House and the Senate for a final vote.  So, a word to your Representative on this issue is also advised. Make sure you find out how he or she voted on the NDAA before getting in touch.

The JBS Weekly Member Update offers activism tips, new educational tools, upcoming events, and JBS perspective. Every Monday this e-newsletter will keep you informed on current action projects and offer insight into news events you won't hear from the mainstream media.
JBS Facebook JBS Twitter JBS YouTube JBS RSS Feed