close

Welcome to JBS.org

Login or create your account below.

Member Login
Error
  • Request Forbidden

Second Amendment



Wondering What's Happening With the Ammunition Accountability Campaign? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Larry Greenley   
Thursday, 08 January 2009 16:29

A few years ago, during the 2005/6 session of the California legislature, an ammunition serialization bill, AB 352, was passed by both houses, but died in Conference on Nov. 30, 2006. A close call!

Nonetheless, beginning in 2007 an ammunition serialization campaign organized by Ammunition Accountability, a lobbying arm of Ammunition Coding System (listen to the interview on NRANews.com posted below for the direct evidence), has been working with state legislatures to get bills passed to mandate ammunition serialization on a state by state basis. It just so happens that Ammunition Coding System would profit handsomely from such mandatory serialization. Although Russ Ford of Ammunition Coding System claimed vigorously during an interview on NRANews.com (posted on January 25, 2008), that they were striving for complete transparency in their activities, as of January 8, 2009, there is still no link from the Ammunition Accountability website to the Ammunition Coding System website, and no link back the other way either.

By clicking on the "Legislation" tab at http://www.ammunitionaccountability.com, you'll see that five state legislatures introduced ammunition serialization resolutions in 2007 and 18 states did so in 2008.

The good news is that ammunition serialization resolutions were introduced in five states in 2007 and 18 states in 2008, but that not a single state passed their resolution. The bad news is that ammunition serialization resolutions were introduced in five states in 2007 and 18 states in 2008. The point is that many state legislatures became more gun-control-friendly with the 2008 elections. So we can't be assured that ammunition serialization bills will continue to be defeated or ignored during this 2009/10 legislative cycle.

Here's an excellent resource to get up to speed on what ammunition serialization is all about and to learn something about Russ Ford and Ammunition Coding System. It's a video of a 43-minute radio interview with Russ Ford on NRANews.com (scroll to bottom of the linked page to see the video). 

For a little flavor of just how bad this ammunition serialization would be consider this excerpt from an online NRA webpage, "Encoded Ammunition"/Bullet Serialization, that was posted on January 25, 2008:

Reasons to Strenuously Oppose This Legislation

People would be required to forfeit all personally-owned non-encoded ammunition. After a certain date, it would be illegal to possess non-encoded ammunition. Gun owners possess hundreds of millions of rounds of ammunition for target shooting, hunting and personal protection. Consider that American manufacturers produce 8 billion rounds each year.

Reloading (re-using cartridge cases multiple times) would be abolished. There would be no way to correspond serial numbers on cartridge cases, and different sets and quantities of bullets.

People would be required to separately register every box of "encoded ammunition." This information would be supplied to the police. Most states do not even require registration of guns. Each box of ammunition would have a unique serial number, thus a separate registration.

Private citizens would have to maintain records, if they sold ammunition to anyone, including family members or friends.

The cost of ammunition would soar, for police and private citizens alike. The Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturing Institute estimates it would take three weeks to produce ammunition currently produced in a single day. For reason of cost, manufacturers would produce only ultra-expensive encoded ammunition, which police would have to buy, just like everyone else.

 

We'll be following and opposing the ongoing Ammunition Accountability campaign in 2009. As such resolutions are introduced in state legislatures, we'll be putting our new state legislative contact service to work to provide an easy way for citizens to contact their state legislators regarding this anti-Second-Amendment campaign. You'll be able to find updates on this ammunition accountability issue at our "Right to Bear Arms Blog" and at our JBS.org Freedom Campaign webpage.

Last Updated on Saturday, 10 January 2009 15:52
 
Hunters and the 2A PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bill Hahn   
Thursday, 20 November 2008 09:13

Gun Digest magazine is reporting gun sales are soaring in anticipation of gun bans under an Obama administration.

Last Updated on Thursday, 20 November 2008 11:26
 
"2A Today for The USA" -- An Excellent New Video on the Second Amendment PDF Print E-mail
Written by Larry Greenley   
Monday, 20 October 2008 14:54
 
Nation’s largest paper proves it does not understand our Constitution. PDF Print E-mail
Written by Jim Capo   
Friday, 27 June 2008 15:35

The opening sentence of today’s headline article in USA Today begins, "The Supreme Court's historic decision Thursday carving out an individual right to gun ownership immediately cast doubt on gun restrictions nationwide..."

While that sentence was slightly cryptic as to whether the editors of USA Today believe (in error) that our rights come from Supreme Court judges or our Constitution, the  beginning sentence of the  3rd paragraph of the article makes it clear that they do not recognize that our Constitution was written to protect our rights rather than grant them:

"The majority opinion, written by Justice Antonin Scalia, established for the first time in U.S. history that the Constitution's Second Amendment gives individuals the right to keep guns at home for self-defense."

Though it seems a basic point of fact that unalienable rights are never bestowed on people by their governments, it appears this simple concept is beyond the comprehension of those who produce USA Today.

Disclaimer: Fear not, I only read USA Today while waiting at hotel check out counters.

Last Updated on Friday, 27 June 2008 15:50
 
A Bad Day for the Right to Bear Arms? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Larry Greenley   
Thursday, 26 June 2008 13:32

It will be a long time until all the dust settles in the wake of today's historic Supreme Court decision regarding the Second Amendment. The news media are focusing on how the decision affirms the Second Amendment as an individual right, not a group right.

The NRA also focused on this aspect of individual right vs. group right in its brief announcement today:

It looks to be a phenomal day for gun owners and District of Columbia residents. 

Our Founding Fathers wrote this as an individual right, they intended it to be an individual right, and the Court is now acknowledging that right. 

Although the Court's affirmation of the Second Amendment as an individual right is certainly very welcome and highly significant, there are some troubling aspects of the Court's decision.

 

Here's a link to a very early analysis of the Supreme Court's DC vs. Heller decision from Steve Bonta as quoted in the JBSForum.org today by Alan Scholl. According to Bonta:

I'm sure you've heard about the Supreme Court's "landmark" ruling today on the Second Amendment. LewRockwell.com, etc., are in full celebration mode, for example. However, the majority decision (much of which I've already read) effectively destroys the Second Amendment....

Finally, Gun Owners of America (GOA) has issued a much more upbeat analysis of today's decision: 

Gun Owners of America today celebrated what amounts to a generally good decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the DC v. Heller case.

In a YouTube video statement released today, GOA even stated that they are "celebrating a great victory at the Supreme Court."

 

Added to this blog on July 2:

Since I posted this blog on June 26, Warren Mass has written an excellent in-depth analysis of the Supreme Court's DC v. Heller decision in "Supreme Court Ruling Affirms Second Amendment."

 

 

 

Last Updated on Wednesday, 02 July 2008 15:17
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>

Page 2 of 3